When I wrote the forum guide I included links to KiCad and Eagle . At the time both were free and both were, it seems, popular. KiCad is still free, Eagle it seems is now not free.
Can I have suggestions and advice on whether to keep or remove from the forum guide the link to Eagle, and for other free software that I might link to as well or instead of Eagle.
I am in favor of only mentioning KiCad explicitly in the guide.
We should avoid any unnecessary verbosity in the guide. Mentioning one tool is sufficient. In this community that is built on the principles of open source, we should always give preference to open source software. It is clear that KiCad is the best choice for an open source EDA.
The guide should be worded to make it clear that we are mentioning KiCad as an option, not as a specific requirement.
It might be an idea to add Circuit Diagram as an option, with it being just a circuit diagram creator with a web-editor, and with a significantly smaller learning curve than KiCad (which is my program of choice)
For Forum users that are simply requested to include a circuit diagram and are new to electronics, a PCB designing software package might be a bit much to dive into.
A question I have to ask now having seen many sites go the same way : what is their business model? They can't stay in business providing a free service. They either have to run ads, or charge subscriptions.
What usually happens is sites start with a "free" service, then later add more revenue earning sources as they gain market share. Often the "free" service disappears, and all those people who spent time creating designs there either have to pay or lose their work.
For those reasons I would not recommend any sites that claim to be "free" without explaining how they can sustain a free model.
I suspect they intend to run ads, but given that this project has started over 5 years ago, there doesn't seem to be any real push for it, and it might not be a 'business' as such.
I was suggesting it as a 'quick' solution to provide 'us' with readable circuit diagram rather than getting something 'Fritzing' , which none of us like but tends to be the choice we are confronted with. And a bit more clear than 'hand-drawn' and more easily modifiable. The user can Download the PNG and post it, so there is nothing to be lost. I haven't used it much at all, and i have no real intention of contributing.
@PerryBebbington
Might be an idea to explicitly renounce Fritzing !
I second the motion to make new users aware of Circuit Diagram. It is trivially easy to learn, and does not require installation of some CAD package.
They can also download their circuits as an SVG, or in Circuit Diagram's native CDDX format (which allow circuits to later be re-imported and modified).
Many people that come to the forum asking for help have no idea how to read a schematic. I use Fritzing all the time in order to show them how to connect an 2N2222 to an Uno and motor.
Fritz diagrams are used all the time in the official Arduino documentation