Hi all,
This is a stupid one to ask i think but if i would replace the a arduino ic with another variant would the library's still work? (not IDE).
I think they should be compatible with most Atmel controllers or am i wrong?
Hi all,
This is a stupid one to ask i think but if i would replace the a arduino ic with another variant would the library's still work? (not IDE).
I think they should be compatible with most Atmel controllers or am i wrong?
You need to say which Atmel (now Microchip) MCU that you are thinking of using. There are Arduino "cores" for many of them, but not all of them.
...R
Tyger:
This is a stupid one to ask i think but if i would replace the a arduino ic with another variant would the library's still work? (not IDE).I think they should be compatible with most Atmel controllers or am i wrong?
By "Arduino IC", people usually mean ATmega328 which is the MCU on Uno's and a lot of variants. Atmel make a lot of controllers, many totally incompatible with ATmega328.
So the degree of compatibility is anywhere in the range 10% to 100%. The only way to give a better answer is to specify exactly which chip the library needs to run.
I like the SAM3X8E (Due) but its overkill so i would like something like the ATSAMD09C13A just because its close and does not have that many io's
I have never used (or needed) any of those "high-powered" microprocessors. I think if I needed more capability than one of the 16MHz Atmegas I would be considering an RPi - perhaps in conjunction with a 16MHz Arduino.
...R
Tyger:
I like the SAM3X8E (Due) but its overkill so i would like something like the ATSAMD09C13A just because its close and does not have that many io's
If you are looking at Cortex M0, why not SAMD21? Arduino Official Store | Boards Shields Kits Accessories