These systems rely on a secure crypto chip built into both the remote and the receiver. Each time you press a button, the remote generates a new code based on an internal counter and a secret seed known only to the remote and receiver. This code is then possibly encrypted using a specific algorithm, often proprietary (or something like KeeLoq).
The receiver keeps track of the expected code and will only accept a signal if it matches the next value in the sequence ➜ so even if you capture multiple transmissions with a radio receiver, the codes will appear different each time and can’t be predicted or replayed without access to the original encryption seed and algorithm.
That means that without physically extracting the seed from the remote’s chip or reverse-engineering the firmware, it’s effectively impossible (within reasonable limits) to reproduce a valid rolling code sequence with an Arduino or something else.
Rolling code systems are specifically designed to resist cloning for this reason, and there’s no practical or reliable method to bypass this security without the original crypto material.
What many of us did was to hack a remote to replace the physical button by an optocoupler (or whatever is suitable for your remote) and the.n drive the optocoupler with an Arduino (I’ve used ESP32 and HomeSpan to integrate that into an HomeKit environment).
No, but if you have spare working remote and arduino with lot of memory, you can copy the signals one by one and use them in same order. But it's much easier to just wire arduino to remote buttons like @J-M-L suggested.
I don’t see how you want this to work as once a signal is used it is not working anymore (and if you mean try to copy the infinite sequence - that’s hard as there is a handshake in some systems or ack to help keep various remotes in sync - not to mention of course the fact that it’s infinite )
So the easiest option is to actually simulate pressing on the button.
No how. I expected roller blinds don't use, but totally possible.
And now that I think about them, even if it works, it might be complicated because of different buttons up/down.
Hi I have the same remote and also have interest to reverse it. I teared it down it has only 1 IC on it, no text on it so hard to tell what's it, but the same company has another product recorded in FCC so it's likely PIC16F636. It also has a high level encoding diagram, but not sure if it applies to this unit too.
I captured the signal using rtlsdr but I have no clue how to interpret it, seems neither NRZ nor Manchester. I am not hardware engineer so not sure if it's a known pattern, do you have any idea?
If you recorded it away from the roller blind receiver coverage, it actually should work. But there can be other things beyond rolling code to be considered.