I don't want to derail the thread by turning it into a discussion about whether a bare schematic with net names is worse than one which shows wires to every possible connection but neither do I want that the OP spends a lot of time in adding wires to the existing schematic which bring little to the understanding. Especially when the design is quite symmetric as this is.
Just to say this: The bare version is good enough for Pololu: https://www.pololu.com/file/0J1463/a-star-328pb-micro-schematic.pdf
For those who want to see wires all over the place, there is this example: Help with Four nano ch340g on one board - #5 by TomGeorge . For me, it is clear which one is more useful.