I'm looking for a way to calculate value of capacitors of pF(pico Farad) range. the thing is when I use a RLC meter, looks like the device is limited to high ranges of pF to nF and so I can not measure value of for example 1pF...
I used this technique
using a microcontroller, I generate 8MHz pulse and pass it through first: a Lowpass filter and then: a peak detector
C1 is the value I'm trying to measure and it is around 1pF to 20pF(I do not knoe the right value, using this circuit I'm trying to measure it).
I've wired the circuit on a breadboard
then I use the equation Vo=Vs(1-exp(-t/tau))
Vs=3.3(STM32F103)
t=(here)62.510^-9
tau=R1C1 and R1=4100ohm
I use a multimeter at the end of circuit where you can see "equivalent voltage"(I use a multimeter because it seems that it has no effect on my circuit for changing values due to very large input resistance ect.)
there are some issues:
1-it seems like the breadboard itself has some pF capacitor adding to my measurements(even for example if I just insert a piece of wire in a hole of breadboard)
2-it seems like the frequency also effects the value of output voltage and so the calculated value of C1.
IIRC soleless breadboard rows have 5 - 10 pF capacitance between them. Skipping a few rows may help but I don't think it is needed. Just measure with and without the cap in circuit. But all other things nearby must be the same. Your hand nearby may do a great difference (this is how capacitive touch sensors/screens work).
right, those are the things that bother my measurements. yeah I've googled
the article I've posted for @Koepel sounds good. I haven't tried it yet.what do you think about it?
It's interesting. I have a DMM that measures capacitance, and also an LCR meter to make finer capacitance measurements, so I don't need anything like this.
What else besides one of the most comprehensive, accurate and readable overviews of impedance measurement that you will probably find on the internet? You complain that it's not enough? Strange... unless I misunderstood...
You seem very fixated on this goal, and seem to be ignoring clear indications of problems by reflecting them back at us to solve. This problem has been around for longer than any of us has been alive. You are not going to make any breakthoughs today. It's also why we don't have easy, bite sized solutions for you.
I checked the article you mentioned. I'm using the same method except that 8MHz is too high for oscilloscope to capture, besides every oscilloscope adds ~20pF to measurements which degrades the situation even more