Hello there. Can I substitute IRFZ44N to FQP30N60L mosfet to controll a 24V Pneumatic Solenoid Valve? Also, Do I need to use a 12V regulated power supply to be able to power the 24V Solenoid Valve?
Thank you.
Hello there. Can I substitute IRFZ44N to FQP30N60L mosfet to controll a 24V Pneumatic Solenoid Valve? Also, Do I need to use a 12V regulated power supply to be able to power the 24V Solenoid Valve?
Thank you.
Why would you like to substitute it?
And why would you try to power 24V valve vith 12V PSU?
I can't find fqp30n60l mosfet.
I saw a video on youtube using a 12v valve and a 12v battery to power the valve with an arduino. I tried the code on the video and used a 12v PSU to power the valve but, the valve does'nt work. Even the LED on the solenoid valve coil isn't lit. So maybe I need a 24V psu for the valve?
It's a 24V valve. Yes, you need 24V to power it.
I think maybe you mean FQP30N6006L ?
Maybe because IRFZ44N is not a logic level MOSFET, so may not fully operate the valve and may get hot during use. IRLZ44N would be a good choice.
Oh sorry. I meant fqp30n06l. Thank you.
Thank you. I'll try IRLZ44N instead.
I'd like to ask, what components should I use to DIY 12V to 24V power supply?
That's the coil resistance of the valve? Or the power consumption?
The spec of the coil is 24V 4.8W.
The PSU im using is 12V 20A.
So the current thought the valve's coil should be 4.8/24 = 0.2A
Look for a "boost" or "step-up" voltage converter module. Since only 0.2A is required, even a small one should be enough.
I agree, but the real answer was "because I saw in youtube"
Also it's not mentioned if this valve is 24VAC or DC. 24VAC valve supplied with 24VDC might get hot as well.
Good point.
sorry. the valve operates at 24V DC
the video that I watched uses FQP30N06L mosfet.
Ok, if you feel to do extra wiring, you could use boost converter proposed by PaulRB.
But you might find some small 24V psu laying somewhere in your house. Have a look.

something like this for example...
You confused me in your first post. You said:
What you meant to say was "Can I substitute IRFZ44N for FQP30N60L".
Changing "to" to "for" in this context completely reverses the meaning.
This topic was automatically closed 180 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.