Consider an "AI button" for the user to filter a thread having hundreds of posts of varying relevance and an unmarked solution resulting in a "question" block, "info/link" block, "cases for/against" block and "solution/possible solution" block, but filter the "interpersonal communications." And, I find the current "Search Forum" field on the forum not very "findy."
What it should not be: An A.I. responding to questions.
Why? Back in the young years of Google, when you could actually write to their support and receive a response, I asked if they might better train their engine to recognize what the human wants versus what the computer finds. Back then, if I had a search for "blue tree" I would get links for anything containing "blue tree" in the label or text, to include work tools and body parts. As you know, Google rolled out a beta for Images and a sub-search (like their image search), and now "blue tree" gets you images of blue trees. The engine took the literal and let the "H.I" (human) direct the desired result.